3 Dodgers legends who deserve more Hall of Fame consideration

VERO BEACH, FL - CIRCA 1977: (L-R) Dusty Baker #12, Steve Garvey #6, Reggie Smith #8 and Ron Cey #10 of the Los Angeles Dodgers poses together for this portrait during Major League Baseball spring training circa 1977 at Holman Stadium in Vero Beach, Florida. The number at the end of each bat displays the amount of home runs each player hit the previous season. (Photo by Focus on Sport/Getty Images)
VERO BEACH, FL - CIRCA 1977: (L-R) Dusty Baker #12, Steve Garvey #6, Reggie Smith #8 and Ron Cey #10 of the Los Angeles Dodgers poses together for this portrait during Major League Baseball spring training circa 1977 at Holman Stadium in Vero Beach, Florida. The number at the end of each bat displays the amount of home runs each player hit the previous season. (Photo by Focus on Sport/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 3
Next
Dodgers
UNSPECIFIED – CIRCA 1978: Pitcher Tommy John #25 of the Los Angeles Dodgers pitches during an Major League Baseball game circa 1978. John played for the Dodgers from 1972-74 and 1976-78. (Photo by Focus on Sport/Getty Images) /

2. Tommy John

Dodgers pitcher Tommy John should be enshrined in the Hall of Fame for his career accolades — and his legacy.

A recent conversation centered around “baseball lives” pitched Tommy John as a shoo-in candidate for what the experimental surgery he underwent meant for the lives of every pitcher who followed him — and that argument is meritorious.

But he also deserves to be honored for his pitching accolades alone.

In some ways a compiler, John’s 288 victories against 231 losses stand tall — especially when you realize that the lion’s share of his honors came after he missed the entire 1975 season at the age of 32 rehabilitating his arm.

After that inflection point, John finished second in the Cy Young chase in 1977 (20-7, 2.78), then posted three consecutive All-Star appearances and three more top-10 Cy Young placements (eighth, second again, fourth), bouncing between New York and Los Angeles. Though he was largely ineffective in six seasons played after the age of 40 (despite going 13-6, 4.03 ERA in 1987 in New York at the age of 44!), that shouldn’t factor too heavily into this conversation.

On the merits of his remarkable comeback alone and the innovations in medical science his gutsy willingness to experiment ushered in, John deserves a keen second look. The careers he saved by pioneering a surgery that is now commonplace (and almost anticipated!) are too numerous to count.

But John was a pretty exceptional pitcher, too. The double whammy calls for a recount on baseball’s highest honor, without any sort of “pioneer” designation.