There's only one roster solution for Dodgers as Blake Snell return nears

The Los Angeles Dodgers don’t really have a decision to make. They have a reality to accept.

With Blake Snell nearing a return, the math of a six-man rotation finally collides with performance, development and long-term vision. And when you strip away the politics, the patience and the projection, there’s only one move that actually makes sense:

Roki Sasaki should be the one going to the minors. But he probably won’t be.

Sasaki has a 5.97 ERA. He hasn’t consistently located his fastball. The pitch that once made him a generational arm — the pitch everything else is built off — simply hasn’t shown up. And without it, nothing else matters.

So if the Dodgers are serious about unlocking what he actually is — not what he’s been in flashes — then the path is clear: take him out of a results-driven environment and let him rebuild.

Sasaki isn't just any free agent signing for the Dodgers. They recruited him. They invested in him. They made an implicit promise about opportunity, runway and belief. And to their credit, they’ve honored it. They’ve given him chance after chance after chance.

Pulling the plug now — even if it’s the right baseball move — isn’t just transactional. It sends a message, not just to Sasaki, but to every international star watching how the Dodgers handle their prized imports.

Which brings us to the likely alternative to be optioned to the minors once Snell returns: Emmet Sheehan.

On paper, it works. Similar struggles. Similar ERA territory. Far less organizational investment. It's certainly an easier decision — but it's also the wrong one. Because while Sheehan’s issues look like inconsistency, Sasaki’s look like identity.

Sheehan has had stretches — real ones — where he’s looked like a major league starter. Sasaki hasn’t had that same baseline. And more importantly, Sheehan doesn’t need a reset. Sasaki does.

Dodgers should send Roki Sasaki to the minors when Blake Snell returns (but don't be surprised if they don't)

If this were purely merit-based, maybe the Dodgers get creative. Maybe they move Justin Wrobleski. But how do you justify that? He has a 0.56 ERA over five starts, a 1.25 ERA overall and a 5-0 record. He just shoved six scoreless innings to stop a losing streak. Demoting him would be borderline irresponsible.

So what it really comes down to is this: best baseball decision? Send Sasaki down. Most likely decision? Send Sheehan down. One is about development, while the other is about managing optics, relationships and investment. And the Dodgers — as progressive as they are — still have to balance both.

The irony in all of this is that the Dodgers have already shown they understand this concept. They did it with Hyeseong Kim. They prioritized development over immediate contribution. They chose reps over roster status — and it worked. This is arguably the same situation, but with higher stakes, louder consequences and a much bigger name attached to it.

There’s only one move that actually solves the Dodgers’ problem. Send Sasaki down. Let him find his fastball. Let him become what he’s supposed to be. Because right now, keeping him in the rotation isn’t helping the team — and it’s definitely not helping him.

But don’t be surprised when the Dodgers choose the easier path instead — even when the harder one is the right one.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Follow